Forget accuses microsoft using legal attack: 3 Replacements You Need to Jump On
“Microsoft has been accused of using legal attacks against Google in a bid to steal customer data.
Apparently, Google has been using legal threats to get Windows XP users to upgrade to Windows 7 as well as their search engine. They are also planning to use the same tactics to get users to switch from Windows Vista to Windows 7, but Microsoft has so far been successful in blocking the move.
I’m a huge fan of a good legal battle. The reason is that legal battles are usually well thought out and put together. They don’t always look like the first draft of a book, but they usually are. The reason I enjoy a legal battle is that it’s a great example of “how not to do it.” In this case, the legal threats are being used to target the wrong “target audience.
In a legal battle, it’s not about what the judge or jury ultimately decides. It’s about how they decide to process the evidence and the arguments. In a legal battle, the opponent has to prove that their client is wrong in regards to their argument. Sometimes the judge will make a statement or an argument to the jury which could be considered a legal argument. In this case, the judge is saying that Microsoft is using legal action to stop them from changing to Windows 7.
There’s a difference between a legal action and a criminal attack. A criminal attack is a crime in and of itself. The judge is saying that Microsoft is using law in a way that makes it look like they’re trying to stop them from changing to Windows 7. In this instance, the judge is saying that Microsoft is trying to get them to stop using Windows 7. This is a legal action. Therefore, the judge is saying that Microsoft is using a legal attack and it is wrong.
Microsoft has a lot of legal cases going on at the moment, including the ones on antitrust, patent, and privacy. But if there was ever a time to sue them, it would be when they were trying to change to Windows 7.
Microsoft, if they did, would probably lose, because they don’t have a large enough legal team to deal with all that. It would be more effective to have them sue them in secret and then just give up and sue them in public later.
Microsoft has always been very secretive about what they do, what they are doing, how they do it, and who they do it for. This secrecy is only going to get worse with the upcoming release of Windows 7 and Windows 8, so if you want to know who Microsoft is doing all this to, just go to Microsoft.com and click “People and Events” under “About” and you can see all the recent Microsoft-related legal actions and settlements.
It’s no secret that they’re using legal tactics to get their way, but the fact that they have to resort to such tactics to win a legal battle is a good thing. They are fighting against the same people that are suing the government (which makes me think they’re trying to get special rights for themselves, but I’m not sure).
There are also plenty of complaints that Microsoft is using the courts as a weapon to settle disputes, like the one that led to the Xbox One being shut down. While they may not be using legal mechanisms to get what they want, it does show that they are willing to take legal action to make their point.
